Ervin Eleskovic vs Patrik Rosenholm Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W W L W L
Form
L W L L L W L W L LH2H: Eleskovic 1 - 0 Rosenholm
They have played 2 sets in total, with Eleskovic winning 2 and Rosenholm winning 0. The last match between Eleskovic and Rosenholm was at the Sweden F1, 28-04-2014, Quarterfinals, Clay with Ervin Eleskovic getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ervin Eleskovic | 1 |
| Patrik Rosenholm | 0 |
Sweden F1(28-04-2014)
7
6
6
3
| Eleskovic | Stats | Rosenholm |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 351 | Highest Rank | 350 |
| 37 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 7 |
| 55% (228-187) | Career Total W/L | 57% (249-189) |
| $15,380 | Career Prize Money | $14,175 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ervin Eleskovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Patrik Rosenholm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Marek Semjan
Player
Patrik Rosenholm
55%
(
63 of
114)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
4
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
9
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
47 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Patrik Rosenholm
57%
(
62 of
108)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
8
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
35 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
104)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Rosenholm
Player
Toby Martin
60%
(
6 of
10)
1st Serve %
77%
(
10 of
13)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
5 of
6)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
17
Total Points Won
6
|
4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Pancaldi
Player
Patrik Rosenholm
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
2
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
59
|
1-6 6-3 3-1 def. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Rosenholm
Player
Albano Olivetti
75%
(
89 of
118)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
3
Aces
28
0
Double Faults
8
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve Won
92%
(
54 of
59)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
31 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
19%
(
20 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(6) 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Appelgren
Player
Patrik Rosenholm
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
49%
(
38 of
77)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
7
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
92%
(
35 of
38)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thibault Venturino
Player
Patrik Rosenholm
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
3
Aces
6
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Patrik Rosenholm
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
102)
11
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Rosenholm
Player
Andres Ariel Fernandez Lopez
52%
(
13 of
25)
1st Serve %
74%
(
26 of
35)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
100%
(
12 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
4%
(
1 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
50
Total Points Won
10
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Malek Jaziri
Player
Patrik Rosenholm
51%
(
43 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
6
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
6
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (228/187) | Win/Loss | 57% (249/189) |
| 54% (506/425) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (553/454) |
| 52% (4574/4307) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4915/4581) |
| 59% (38/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (58/53) |
| 53% (83/74) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (124/78) |
| 56% (106/84) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (67/58) |
| 25% (1/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 147 | Aces Total | 481 |
| 0.03 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 150 | Total Double Faults | 295 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 505.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 546.02 |
| 55% (1068/1952) | 1st Serve % | 59% (5150/8677) |
| 73% (777/1068) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (3620/5150) |
| 45% (398/884) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (1874/3527) |
| 35% (55/158) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (308/783) |
| 36% (692/1930) | Return Points Win % | 37% (3351/8939) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 38% (14/23) | Main Tour W/L | 38% (9/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (59/48) | Challenger W/L | 56% (33/26) |
| 57% (155/115) | Futures W/L | 58% (206/147) |
| 55% (225/410) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (239/423) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 63% (92/145) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (65/117) |
| 50% (52/104) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (75/137) |
| 88% (231/203) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (251/209) |
| 12% (231/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (251/42) |
| 14% (184/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (187/37) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
